NOW LET US – AI RAG SaaS Studio TP.HCM
NOW LET US
Digital Product Studio
Back to news
AGENTIC-SYSTEMS...1 min read

Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents

Share
NOW LET US Article – Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents

A new study proposes a prompt-based uncertainty decomposition method that enables LLM agents to detect ambiguous user requests and proactively seek clarification. This approach significantly outperforms existing methods across multiple large language models, including GPT-5.1 and DeepSeek-v3.2.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title:Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Recent position papers argue that the classical aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty framework is insufficient for interactive large language model (LLM) agents and call for underspecification-aware, decomposed, and communicable uncertainty representations that can unlock new agent capabilities such as proactive clarification seeking and shared mental-model building. Practical deployment constraints -- black-box APIs, interactive latency budgets, and the absence of labeled trajectories -- rule out logprob-based, multi-sampling, and training-based methods, leaving prompt-based estimation as the most viable family for surfacing such signals at deployment time. We answer this call with a simple prompt-based decomposition that separates action confidence from request uncertainty (u), enabling the agent to ask for clarification when the task specification is ambiguous. To evaluate it, we introduce two clarification-augmented benchmarks (WebShop-Clarification and ALFWorld-Clarification) in which 50% of tasks are deliberately underspecified, and systematically compare the proposed decomposition against ReAct+UE and Uncertainty-Aware Memory (UAM) across five LLM backbones (GPT-5.1, DeepSeek-v3.2-exp, GLM-4.7, Qwen3.5-35B, GPT-OSS-120B) on these variants together with the standard WebShop, ALFWorld, and REAL benchmarks for fault detection. Averaged across the five backbones, the proposed decomposition improves clarification F1 on ALFWorld-Clarification by 73% over ReAct+UE and by 36% over UAM, and leads clarification F1 on every backbone on WebShop-Clarification and on four of five backbones on ALFWorld-Clarification, indicating that the gains generalize beyond a single LLM.

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? **Learn more about arXivL

© 2026 Now Let Us. All rights reserved.

Source: arXiv cs.AI Recent

Advertisement
Ad slot ready: 5887729102

More in this category

NOW LET US Related – Analyzing the Narration Gap in LLM-Solver Loops

agentic-systems

Analyzing the Narration Gap in LLM-Solver Loops

A new study highlights the 'narration gap' in hybrid LLM-solver systems, revealing that while the formal solver produces sound results, adversaries can still manipulate the LLM to invert the final answer via prompt injection.

NOW LET US Related – LLM Doesn't Know What It Doesn't Know: Detecting Epistemic Blind Spots via Cross-Model Attribution Divergence on Clinical Tabular Data

agentic-systems

LLM Doesn't Know What It Doesn't Know: Detecting Epistemic Blind Spots via Cross-Model Attribution Divergence on Clinical Tabular Data

A recent study reveals that Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to recognize their own knowledge limits when processing structured clinical tabular data. By comparing Qwen 2.5 7B with XGBoost, researchers identified critical epistemic blind spots and proposed a cross-model calibration method to address this limitation.

NOW LET US Related – Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems

agentic-systems

Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems

Autonomous agentic AI systems introduce novel security and compliance challenges that exceed the capabilities of current policy engines. To address this, researchers propose AgenticRei, a runtime governance framework utilizing deontic policies to strictly control AI behavior outside the LLM.

NOW LET US Related – AI4SE and SE4AI Exploration: A Decade Looking Back and Forward

agentic-systems

AI4SE and SE4AI Exploration: A Decade Looking Back and Forward

A new study traces a decade of progress in the intersection of AI and Systems Engineering (SE) across three developmental phases. By identifying five critical research gaps, the authors provide a roadmap for AI adoption, assurance, and workforce transformation in the field.

NOW LET US Related – Emergent Alignment

agentic-systems

Emergent Alignment

Researchers have introduced "Emergent Alignment," a method enabling Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect and self-correct their own unethical outputs. By integrating a "conscience step" and DPO optimization, this technique helps AI maintain ethical standards without relying on external judge models.

NOW LET US Related – ITNet: A Learnable Integral Transform That Subsumes Convolution, Attention, and Recurrence

agentic-systems

ITNet: A Learnable Integral Transform That Subsumes Convolution, Attention, and Recurrence

Researchers have introduced ITNet, a unified neural network architecture that mathematically subsumes convolution, self-attention, and recurrence under a single learnable integral transform, matching or exceeding specialized baselines across multiple modalities.

EXPLORE TOPICS

Discover All Categories

Deep dive into the specific technology sectors that matter most to you.