NOW LET US – AI RAG SaaS Studio TP.HCM
NOW LET US
Digital Product Studio
Back to news
AGENTIC-SYSTEMS...1 min read

Analyzing the Narration Gap in LLM-Solver Loops

Share
NOW LET US Article – Analyzing the Narration Gap in LLM-Solver Loops

A new study highlights the 'narration gap' in hybrid LLM-solver systems, revealing that while the formal solver produces sound results, adversaries can still manipulate the LLM to invert the final answer via prompt injection.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title:Analyzing the Narration Gap in LLM-Solver Loops

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Formal tools such as SAT and SMT solvers are increasingly embedded in language model reasoning pipelines when a safety or security critical question can be formulated in logic. Unlike chain of thought whose steps are sampled from the model distribution without formal guarantee, a solver produces a sound and independently verifiable answer. However, the soundness guarantee can be lost in the interaction between the solver and the model. The hybrid pipeline has three components: formalizing the question, deciding it, and narrating the result. Prior work has studied the formalization and decision, but not narration, which is the step that turns a formal tool's output into the user answer. To fill the narration gap, we first model the LLM-solver loop as a verified decision procedure. We further evaluate five open-sourced models under prompt injection, and we find certificate gating makes the solver verdict sound, while an adversary can invert a verified conclusion across phrasings and channels. We study the mitigation through hardened prompt that reduces injection significantly but cannot eliminate it and still suffers under adaptive attack. Combining the formal analysis and empirical studies, we show in the LLM-solver loop, robustness does not reach to the answer that the user finally reads.

Current browse context:

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

© 2026 Now Let Us. All rights reserved.

Source: arXiv cs.AI Recent

Advertisement
Ad slot ready: 5887729102

More in this category

NOW LET US Related – LLM Doesn't Know What It Doesn't Know: Detecting Epistemic Blind Spots via Cross-Model Attribution Divergence on Clinical Tabular Data

agentic-systems

LLM Doesn't Know What It Doesn't Know: Detecting Epistemic Blind Spots via Cross-Model Attribution Divergence on Clinical Tabular Data

A recent study reveals that Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to recognize their own knowledge limits when processing structured clinical tabular data. By comparing Qwen 2.5 7B with XGBoost, researchers identified critical epistemic blind spots and proposed a cross-model calibration method to address this limitation.

NOW LET US Related – Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems

agentic-systems

Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems

Autonomous agentic AI systems introduce novel security and compliance challenges that exceed the capabilities of current policy engines. To address this, researchers propose AgenticRei, a runtime governance framework utilizing deontic policies to strictly control AI behavior outside the LLM.

NOW LET US Related – AI4SE and SE4AI Exploration: A Decade Looking Back and Forward

agentic-systems

AI4SE and SE4AI Exploration: A Decade Looking Back and Forward

A new study traces a decade of progress in the intersection of AI and Systems Engineering (SE) across three developmental phases. By identifying five critical research gaps, the authors provide a roadmap for AI adoption, assurance, and workforce transformation in the field.

NOW LET US Related – Emergent Alignment

agentic-systems

Emergent Alignment

Researchers have introduced "Emergent Alignment," a method enabling Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect and self-correct their own unethical outputs. By integrating a "conscience step" and DPO optimization, this technique helps AI maintain ethical standards without relying on external judge models.

NOW LET US Related – Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents

agentic-systems

Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents

A new study proposes a prompt-based uncertainty decomposition method that enables LLM agents to detect ambiguous user requests and proactively seek clarification. This approach significantly outperforms existing methods across multiple large language models, including GPT-5.1 and DeepSeek-v3.2.

NOW LET US Related – ITNet: A Learnable Integral Transform That Subsumes Convolution, Attention, and Recurrence

agentic-systems

ITNet: A Learnable Integral Transform That Subsumes Convolution, Attention, and Recurrence

Researchers have introduced ITNet, a unified neural network architecture that mathematically subsumes convolution, self-attention, and recurrence under a single learnable integral transform, matching or exceeding specialized baselines across multiple modalities.

EXPLORE TOPICS

Discover All Categories

Deep dive into the specific technology sectors that matter most to you.