NOW LET US – AI RAG SaaS Studio TP.HCM
NOW LET US
Digital Product Studio
Back to news
DEV-TOOLS...6 min read

WordStar: A Writer's Word Processor (1996)

Share
NOW LET US Article – WordStar: A Writer's Word Processor (1996)

An insightful look into why legendary authors like George R.R. Martin and Arthur C. Clarke preferred the classic DOS-based WordStar over modern word processors, highlighting its revolutionary touch-typing interface.

SFWRITER.COM > Nonfiction > WordStar

A Writer's Word Processor

by Robert J. Sawyer

*Copyright 1990 and 1996 by *Robert J. Sawyer. To download the full final version of WordStar — WordStar for DOS 7.0 Rev. D — along with plug-and-play MS-DOS emulator packages for running it under Windows, see: WordStar 7.0 Archives And for why I continue to use and love WordStar well into the 21st century, see below. | "Sawyer's long post [below] about WordStar is extremely insightful." —Matthew Kirschenbaum, author of Track Changes: A Literary History of Word Processing "A fine word processing program called WordStar. It never crashed, and it never failed, and I loved it immoderately." —Michael Chabon, author of The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay "As testimony to how good WordStar is, even I became proficient at it and wrote a dozen novels and hundreds of short stories on it. A great system, especially compared to MS Word." —Edo van Belkom, author of Scream Queen "I am happy to greet the geniuses [Rob Barnaby and Seymour Rubinstein, the creators of WordStar] who made me a born-again writer. Having announced my retirement in 1978, I now have six books in the works and two [probables], all through WordStar." —Arthur C. Clarke, author of 2001: A Space Odyssey "I have a secret weapon: I use WordStar. It does everything I want a word-processing program to do." —George R.R. Martin, author of A Game of Thrones "WordStar was magnificent. I loved it. It was logical, beautiful, perfect. Compared to it, Microsoft Word is pure madness." —Anne Rice, author of Interview with the Vampire Many science-fiction writers — including myself, Roger MacBride Allen, Gerald Brandt, Jeffrey A. Carver, Arthur C. Clarke, David Gerrold, Terence M. Green, James Gunn, Matthew Hughes, Donald Kingsbury, Eric Kotani, Paul Levinson, George R. R. Martin, Vonda McIntyre, Kit Reed, Jennifer Roberson, and Edo van Belkom — continue to use WordStar for DOS as our writing tool of choice. Still, most of us have endured years of mindless criticism of our decision, usually from WordPerfect users, and especially from WordPerfect users who have never tried anything but that program. I've used WordStar, WordPerfect, Word, MultiMate, Sprint, XyWrite, and just about every other MS-DOS and Windows word-processing package, and WordStar is by far my favorite choice for creative composition at the keyboard. That's the key point: aiding creative composition. To understand how WordStar does that better than other programs, let me start with a little history.

AN INTERFACE DESIGNED FOR TOUCH TYPISTS

WordStar was first released in 1978, before there was any standardization in computer keyboards. At that time, many keyboards lacked arrow keys for cursor movement and special function keys for issuing commands. Some even lacked such keys as Tab , Insert , Delete , Backspace , and Enter . About all you could count on was having a standard QWERTY typewriter layout of alphanumeric keys and a Control key. The Control key is a specialized shift key. When depressed simultaneously with an alphabetic key, it causes the keyboard to generate a specific command instruction, rather than the letter. Control codes are frequently indicated in text by preceding the letter with a caret, like so: ^A . WordStar's original designers, Seymour Rubinstein and Rob Barnaby, selected five control codes to be prefixes for bringing up additional menus of functions: ^O for On-screen functions; ^Q for Quick cursor functions; ^P for Print functions; ^K for block and file functions; and ^J for help. Now, the first three of these are alphabetically mnemonic. The last two, ^K and ^J , might at first glance seem to be arbitrary choices. They aren't. Look at a typewriter keyboard. You'll see that for a touch typist, the two strongest fingers of the right hand rest over ^J and ^K on the home typing row. WordStar recognizes that the most-often-used functions should be the easiest to physically execute. To serve as arrow keys for moving the cursor up, left, right, or down, WordStar adopted ^E , ^S , ^D , and ^X . Again, looking at a typewriter keyboard makes the logic of this plain. These four keys are arranged in a diamond under the left hand: E S D X Such positional, as opposed to alphabetic, mnemonics form a large part of the WordStar interface. Additional cursor-movement commands are clustered around the E /S /D /X diamond: W E R A S D F Z X C ^A and ^F , on the home typing row, move the cursor left and right by words. ^W and ^Z , to the left of the cursor-up and cursor-down commands, scroll the screen up and down by single lines. ^R and ^C , to the right of the cursor-up and cursor-down commands, scroll the screen up and down a page at a time (a "page" in the computer sense of a full screen of text). ^Q , the aforementioned quick-cursor-movement menu prefix, extends the power of this diamond. Just as ^E , ^S , ^D , ^X move the cursor up, left, right, and down by single characters, ^QE , ^QS , ^QD , and ^QX move it all the way to the top, left, right, or bottom of the screen. ^W scrolls up one line; ^QW scrolls up continuously. ^Z scrolls down one line; ^QZ scrolls down continuously. And since ^R and ^C take you to the top and bottom of the screen, ^QR and ^QC take you to the top and bottom of the document. There are many more ^Q commands, but I think you can see from this sampling that there is an underlying logic to the WordStar interface, something sorely lacking in many other programs — particularly WordPerfect. Now, for many of these functions there are dedicated keys on IBM PC keyboards. WordStar allows you to use these, if you're so inclined. But touch-typists find that using the WordStar Control -key commands is much more efficient, because they can be typed from the home row without hunting for special keys elsewhere on the keyboard. Because of this, many applications, including dBase, SuperCalc, SideKick, CompuServe's TAPCIS and OzCis, Genie's Aladdin, Xtree Pro, Joe's Own Editor, VDE, and even Microsoft's editor included with MS-DOS 5.0 and above, have adopted some or all of the WordStar interface. Some keyboards have the Control key to the left of the letter A . This makes using WordStar commands very simple. Other keyboards instead have CapsLock next to the A and place the Control key below the left Shift key, making WordStar commands a bit of a stretch. Because of this, WordStar comes with a utility called SWITCH.COM to optionally swap the functions of the CapsLock and Control keys. One of the problems with other word-processing programs is that many commands can only easily be issued through function and dedicated cursor keys, and the locations of these keys changes radically from keyboard to keyboard (for instance, function keys are sometimes arrayed as two columns of five on the left-hand side of the keyboard and sometimes as a continuous row across the top of the keyboard; cursor keys are sometimes clustered in a diamond and sometimes laid out in an inverted-T shape; on laptop computers you may have to press a special Fn key in combination with the arrow keys to access PgUp and other functions, making using these programs an exercise in contortion). But all one has to do to make any keyboard an optimal WordStar keyboard is run the CapsLock / Control switcher, if necessary. The locations of the other keys are irrelevant, because you don't need them for WordStar. On the other hand, WordPerfect's interface forces touch typists to constantly move their hands from the home typing row, slowing them down. To issue a WordPerfect command, you must first press a function key, eith

© 2026 Now Let Us. All rights reserved.

Source: Hacker News

Advertisement
Ad slot ready: 5887729102

More in this category

NOW LET US Related – Ultrasound imaging of the brain

dev-tools

Ultrasound imaging of the brain

A breakthrough in transcranial ultrasound imaging achieves 100x higher resolution than CT, opening new doors for non-invasive brain-computer interfaces and medical diagnostics.

NOW LET US Related – Introducing the FFASR Leaderboard: Benchmarking ASR in the Real World

dev-tools

Introducing the FFASR Leaderboard: Benchmarking ASR in the Real World

Treble Technologies and Hugging Face have launched the Far-Field ASR (FFASR) Leaderboard, the first open, community-driven benchmark designed to evaluate ASR models under realistic far-field acoustic conditions.

NOW LET US Related – Shipping huggingface_hub every week with AI, open tools, and a human in the loop

dev-tools

Shipping huggingface_hub every week with AI, open tools, and a human in the loop

Hugging Face automated their huggingface_hub release cycle from weeks to a weekly cadence using GitHub Actions and open-weights AI models. By combining LLMs with deterministic guardrails, they streamline release notes generation while keeping a human in the loop for final approval.

NOW LET US Related – Steam Machine launches today

dev-tools

Steam Machine launches today

Valve's highly anticipated Steam Machines have officially launched worldwide, running on the Linux-based SteamOS. This ambitious hardware initiative aims to bring PC gaming directly into the living room, challenging traditional consoles.

NOW LET US Related – Show HN: Oak – Git alternative designed for agents

dev-tools

Show HN: Oak – Git alternative designed for agents

Oak is an open-source version control system designed specifically for AI agents, offering branch-per-session workflows and lazy mounts for rapid repository editing.

NOW LET US Related – The text in Claude Code’s “Extended Thinking” output

dev-tools

The text in Claude Code’s “Extended Thinking” output

A developer discovered that Claude Code encrypts its local reasoning logs, leaving users with only a summary of the AI's thinking process. This raises transparency and auditing concerns, highlighting the limitations of proprietary AI models.

EXPLORE TOPICS

Discover All Categories

Deep dive into the specific technology sectors that matter most to you.