NOW LET US – AI RAG SaaS Studio TP.HCM
NOW LET US
Digital Product Studio
Back to news
AGENTIC-SYSTEMS...1 min read

Why Solve It Twice? Hierarchical Accumulation of Skills for Transfer-Efficient ML Engineering

Share
NOW LET US Article – Why Solve It Twice? Hierarchical Accumulation of Skills for Transfer-Efficient ML Engineering

Researchers introduce HASTE, a hierarchical multi-agent system that organizes cross-competition knowledge into three scope tiers, allowing ML agents to accumulate and reuse skills, significantly reducing compute costs and improving performance.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title:Why Solve It Twice? Hierarchical Accumulation of Skills for Transfer-Efficient ML Engineering

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:ML engineering agents waste compute rediscovering known techniques because every competition is a cold start. We present HASTE, a hierarchical multi-agent system that organizes cross-competition knowledge into three scope tiers (global, domain, and competition-specific), each coupled to a matching agent level. An orchestrator coordinates domain specialists and promotes learning between tiers via LLM-driven abstraction. A controlled ablation provides evidence for scoped loading: holding a 159-skill inventory constant across 8 competitions, tiered loading achieves a 100% medal rate while flat loading reaches only 62.5%, the same medal rate as loading no skills, and consumes 2x the output tokens. On the full MLE-Bench Lite benchmark (22 Kaggle competitions), HASTE reaches a medal rate of 77.3% using Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 12h per competition. In a cold-start run, the system begins with no accumulated skills. In warm-start runs, it reloads skills learned from earlier competitions, using only global and domain-level skills for transfer across competitions. Warm starts use 52% fewer refinement iterations, and the fraction of proposed changes kept by the agent rises from 42% at low inventory to 85% once 50+ skills are available. These results suggest that better knowledge organization can partly substitute for model strength and compute budget in ML-engineering agents.

Current browse context:

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

© 2026 Now Let Us. All rights reserved.

Source: arXiv cs.AI Recent

Advertisement
Ad slot ready: 5887729102

More in this category

NOW LET US Related – How Can AI Find My Model? A Model-Finding Experimental Study Considering Data Formats, Embeddings, and Retrieval Strategies

agentic-systems

How Can AI Find My Model? A Model-Finding Experimental Study Considering Data Formats, Embeddings, and Retrieval Strategies

A recent experimental study explores how AI can optimize the discovery and reuse of simulation models using natural language queries. By evaluating data formats, embedding models, and retrieval strategies, the research establishes a baseline for AI-driven model composability and interoperability.

NOW LET US Related – Beyond expert users: agents should help users construct preferences, not just elicit them

agentic-systems

Beyond expert users: agents should help users construct preferences, not just elicit them

Current AI agents assume users have well-formed preferences, but a new study argues they should instead help users construct these preferences by providing domain knowledge. Evaluating frontier models on a new benchmark called CoShop reveals significant limitations in how current AI assists users in understanding their own needs.

NOW LET US Related – AgentBound: Verifiable Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents

agentic-systems

AgentBound: Verifiable Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents

Researchers have introduced AgentBound, a runtime governance framework that provides verifiable behavioral oversight for autonomous AI agents. By combining three independent authorities and generating cryptographically verifiable receipts, AgentBound establishes a deterministic governance layer between authorization and execution.

NOW LET US Related – Start building with Nano Banana 2 Lite and Gemini Omni Flash

agentic-systems

Start building with Nano Banana 2 Lite and Gemini Omni Flash

Google has launched Nano Banana 2 Lite, its fastest and most cost-effective image generation model, alongside Gemini Omni Flash, a powerful tool for video generation and conversational editing. Together, these models empower developers to build seamless, end-to-end multimedia workflows.

NOW LET US Related – GPTNT: Benchmarking Real-Time Collaboration Between Multimodal Agents on Keep Talking And Nobody Explodes

agentic-systems

GPTNT: Benchmarking Real-Time Collaboration Between Multimodal Agents on Keep Talking And Nobody Explodes

Researchers introduce GPTNT, a new benchmark based on the game 'Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes' to evaluate real-time collaboration between multimodal AI agents. The study reveals that current state-of-the-art models fail to defuse a single bomb in real-time, highlighting key weaknesses in AI coordination.

NOW LET US Related – The Two Genie Game: Adoption and Welfare in Audit-Grounded AI Governance

agentic-systems

The Two Genie Game: Adoption and Welfare in Audit-Grounded AI Governance

A game-theoretic study analyzes when harm-minimizing AI agents can displace approval-seeking RLHF agents in competitive markets, revealing that self-audited AI is not a silver bullet for preventing community harm.

EXPLORE TOPICS

Discover All Categories

Deep dive into the specific technology sectors that matter most to you.