Robotically assembled building blocks could make construction more efficient and sustainable

MIT researchers have developed a robotic assembly system using modular 'voxels' that could reduce a building's carbon footprint by up to 82%. This approach offers a faster, more sustainable alternative to traditional construction methods like 3D concrete printing.
Robotically assembled building blocks could be a more environmentally friendly method for erecting large-scale structures than some existing construction techniques, according to a new study by MIT researchers. The team conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the efficiency of constructing a simple building using “voxels,” which are modular 3D subunits that assemble into complex, durable structures.
After studying the performance of multiple voxels, the researchers developed three new designs intended to streamline building construction. They also produced a robotic assembler and a user-friendly interface for generating voxel-based building layouts and feeding instructions to the robots. Their results indicate this voxel-based robotic assembly system could reduce embodied carbon — all of the carbon emitted during the lifecycle of building materials — by as much as 82 percent, compared with popular techniques like 3D concrete printing, precast modular concrete, and steel framing.
“I’m particularly excited about how the robotic assembly of discrete lattices can enable a practical way to apply digital fabrication to the built environment in a way that can let us build much more efficiently and sustainably,” says Miana Smith, a graduate student in the Center for Bits and Atoms (CBA) at MIT and lead author the study.
To accelerate construction, they designed a robotic assembly system based on inchworm-like robots that crawl across a voxel structure by anchoring and extending their bodies. These Modular Inchworm Lattice Assembler robots, or MILAbots, use grippers on each end to place voxel building blocks and engage the snap-fit connections.
The researchers found that steel and wood voxels offered significant environmental benefits. Utilizing steel voxels would generate only 36 percent of the embodied carbon required for 3D concrete printing. Plywood voxels had the lowest carbon footprint, requiring about 17 percent of the embodied carbon needed for traditional methods. Additionally, while one MILAbot working alone is slow, a team of 20 robots working in parallel can surpass existing automation methods at a lower cost.
“One benefit of this method is how incremental it is. You can start building, and if it turns out you need a new room, you can just add onto the structure. It is also reversible, so if your use changes, you can dissemble the voxels and change the structure,” says senior author Neil Gershenfeld. The next step in this project will be a larger testbed in Bhutan to test construction for a planned sustainable city.
Source: Robohub














