NOW LET US – AI RAG SaaS Studio TP.HCM
NOW LET US
Digital Product Studio
Back to news
DEV-TOOLS...3 min read

Public Service Announcement: Don't Say You Use AI for Writing

Share
NOW LET US Article – Public Service Announcement: Don't Say You Use AI for Writing

Publicly admitting to using AI for writing can inadvertently ruin your professional reputation. When the line between 'assisting' and 'replacing' becomes blurred, readers and professionals will likely question your actual capabilities.

…also don’t tell lies. But I’m getting ahead of myself already.

I keep running into people online who openly say that they use AI to do their writing for them. Now, technically, they may say they use AI to “help” their writing. It doesn’t matter. The distinction is immediately lost on everyone who sees that assertion, because when AI writes for you it does a lot more than just “help,” and everyone knows it.

My policy is that I never let AI draft anything for me that has my name on it. Not one sentence. Nothing. Ever.** (You can download my official AI writing policy here.)** When I was a year behind in writing Taking Testing Seriously, was I tempted to use AI to speed things up? No. It would be like hooking a motor to a stationary bike and calling that exercise. It would be like taking a helicopter to the top of Everest and saying that I summited.

I once ghost wrote an article for someone who was a poor writer. As I did so I had tremendous influence over the ideas, not just the style of writing. I chose what to put in and leave out. He could have had more influence, but to do that he would have had to take a very active role. Yet, he didn’t. The article was published in a book, and it had his name on it, but it was substantially my work. I did this because, at the time, I was trying to keep the peace in a small community, but it bothers me, to this day, that I helped burnish the professional image of a man who didn’t earn it. Maybe, today, the same fellow would use ChatGPT.

I have also helped other people write in such a way that we deeply collaborated. The chapter on Prospective Testing, in Taking Testing Seriously, was based on the somewhat jumbled but information-rich notes from, and conversation with, Jeff Nadelman. I respected Jeff when I started writing that article with him, and I respected him more, dozens of Zoom calls later, when we finished. Both our names are on that one. If you look at that chapter, Jeff’s key tangible contributions are stories separated out from the main body of the article. Those are his personal experiences. Apart from that, he contributed by talking with me for many many hours. That chapter is absolutely his as much as mine.

If AI deeply collaborates with you to write something, why am I saying you shouldn’t say you used AI? Because all I have is your word for it that you did any work at all. Unless I know exactly how you did that work– which would have to have been from personal observation– I can’t know the truth. (Yet you can check with Jeff Nadelman to confirm how we worked on that article.) So, in my mind, I am forced to put a big fat asterisk next to anything you do. Is that what you want? Meanwhile, if AI drafts a document for you, and you claim it’s your work, that’s a lie. Don’t tell lies.

Now put two and two together: Don’t tell me that AI helped you write, and don’t tell me that you did all the work when you only did some of it. Therefore, don’t use AI to write things for you that you present as your own work. If you DO, I will treat all your work as if it is slop or spam. And not just me, the entire community of serious professionals will discount “your” work. It used to be that we could take it on faith when someone turned in work that they claimed was theirs. No longer. Now it depends on your reputation.

Consider what you would think if someone said this to you: “I’m a skilled liar. I frequently tell lies. But don’t worry, I wouldn’t lie to you!”

A liar might say “I wouldn’t lie to you.” But ONLY a liar would say “I frequently tell lies.” Similarly, only someone who uses AI to help their writing would say “I use AI to help my writing.” And anyone who uses AI to help their writing may use it to do all of their writing. It’s such a steep and slippery slope to full laziness. We all know that. We are all thinking that.

So don’t say it. Don’t do it. In a world where there are ads with Matthew Broderick exhorting you to take a day off and let AI do your job, we are all perched on the top of a very steep cliff. Will you throw your reputation down the abyss?

© 2026 Now Let Us. All rights reserved.

Source: Hacker News

Advertisement
Ad slot ready: 5887729102

More in this category

NOW LET US Related – Who Owns Your ATProto Identity? Hint: It's Probably Not You

dev-tools

Who Owns Your ATProto Identity? Hint: It's Probably Not You

An in-depth analysis of ATProto's key management system reveals critical security risks, where PDS operators hold absolute control over user identities and actions across the entire ecosystem.

NOW LET US Related – Beyond All Reason (Free Total Annihilation Inspired RTS)

dev-tools

Beyond All Reason (Free Total Annihilation Inspired RTS)

Inspired by the legendary Total Annihilation, Beyond All Reason is a free-to-play RTS game that redefines the genre with unmatched scale and real-time physics simulation.

NOW LET US Related – A 3D voxel game engine written in APL

dev-tools

A 3D voxel game engine written in APL

An experimental project demonstrates the viability of using the APL array programming language to build a 3D voxel game engine, challenging traditional game development workflows.

NOW LET US Related – The 100k Whys of AI

dev-tools

The 100k Whys of AI

While large language models (LLMs) are highly sophisticated, distinguishing AI-generated content remains feasible due to the quasi-deterministic nature of the technology. The flood of repetitive books on Amazon clearly demonstrates how AI tends to replicate itself when faced with similar prompts.

NOW LET US Related – Building reliable agentic AI systems

dev-tools

Building reliable agentic AI systems

A case study on how Bayer and Thoughtworks built PRINCE, an agentic AI platform that transforms preclinical drug discovery data retrieval using Agentic RAG and Text-to-SQL.

NOW LET US Related – Your brain was never designed for this much bad news

dev-tools

Your brain was never designed for this much bad news

Humans evolved to pay close attention to danger, but today that instinct is being overwhelmed by an endless supply of bad news. Researchers suggest the solution is not to stop following current events, but to build healthier habits around how we consume news.

EXPLORE TOPICS

Discover All Categories

Deep dive into the specific technology sectors that matter most to you.