NOW LET US – AI RAG SaaS Studio TP.HCM
NOW LET US
Digital Product Studio
Back to news
AGENTIC-SYSTEMS...1 min read

Dissecting model behavior through agent trajectories

Share
NOW LET US Article – Dissecting model behavior through agent trajectories

A new study reveals that AI agent performance is fundamentally a systems problem rather than just a modeling issue, introducing the concept of the 'intent-execution' gap. By analyzing 138k agent trajectories, researchers look beyond standard benchmarks to uncover how different frontier models approach autonomous problem-solving.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title:Dissecting model behavior through agent trajectories

View PDFAbstract:AI agent performance is not just a modeling problem, it is fundamentally a systems problem. The advanced capabilities of models are realized through agent harnesses. Therefore, a gap between model assumptions and harness behavior can easily prevent the model's full capabilities from translating into agent performance. We formalize this as the intent-execution' gap: the mismatch between what the model intends and what the harness executes, and vice versa. We argue that minimizing this intent-execution gap is as important as other aspects of harness design such as tools and execution loops. To illustrate the impact of this harness-model alignment, we develop a simple and customizable harness called Simple Strands Agent' (SSA). SSA aims to find the bulk of common patterns which generalize across different model families (such as Claude, Gemini, GPT, Grok, Qwen), as well as a small number of model-specific preferences. We make two contributions: (i) we $\textbf{reproduce or improve on the pass@1}$ performance reported by diverse model-provider families on popular agentic benchmarks (SWE-Pro, SWE-Verified and Terminal-Bench-2), and (ii) building on an $\textbf{analysis of 138k trajectories generated by SSA}$, we look beyond the $\texttt{pass@1}$ numbers which tend to be relatively even across frontier models. By representing agent trajectories in code state-spaces, we observe model-level differences in problem-solving behavior. Finer-grained metrics such as edit frequency, testing activity, and phase-transitions reveal how individual models allocate effort across different stages of autonomous problem solving.

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

© 2026 Now Let Us. All rights reserved.

Source: arXiv cs.AI Recent

Advertisement
Ad slot ready: 5887729102

More in this category

NOW LET US Related – Nothing from Something: Can a Language Model Discover 0?

agentic-systems

Nothing from Something: Can a Language Model Discover 0?

A new study investigates whether AI language models can independently discover the mathematical concept of 'zero'. The findings reveal that while models cannot generalize this concept out-of-the-box, language pretraining reduces the required training examples by 50%.

NOW LET US Related – SEAGym: An Evaluation Environment for Self-Evolving LLM Agents

agentic-systems

SEAGym: An Evaluation Environment for Self-Evolving LLM Agents

Researchers have introduced SEAGym, a new evaluation environment designed to accurately measure the self-evolution of LLM agents. This tool addresses the limitations of traditional evaluation methods, which often overlook overfitting or performance degradation.

NOW LET US Related – Closing the Feedback Loop: From Experience Extraction to Insight Governance in Verbal Reinforcement Learning

agentic-systems

Closing the Feedback Loop: From Experience Extraction to Insight Governance in Verbal Reinforcement Learning

Researchers propose a three-layer architecture (rules, evidence, skills) to close the feedback loop in verbal reinforcement learning, solving the retention-forgetting dilemma for LLM agents in non-stationary environments.

NOW LET US Related – MapSatisfyBench: Benchmarking Satisfaction-Aware Map Agents through Behavior-Grounded Implicit Decision Factors

agentic-systems

MapSatisfyBench: Benchmarking Satisfaction-Aware Map Agents through Behavior-Grounded Implicit Decision Factors

Researchers have introduced MapSatisfyBench, a new benchmark for evaluating LLM-based map agents. It shifts the evaluation focus from simple task completion to satisfying implicit user needs and optimizing real-world user satisfaction.

NOW LET US Related – MemTrace: Probing What Final Accuracy Misses in Long-Term Memory

agentic-systems

MemTrace: Probing What Final Accuracy Misses in Long-Term Memory

While LLM agents increasingly maintain long-term memory, traditional evaluation methods fail to show how facts behave under changing conditions. The new MemTrace benchmark reveals that the primary bottleneck in AI memory is evidence utilization, not retrieval.

NOW LET US Related – Surrogate Assisted Pedestrian Protection Design via a Foundation Model Orchestrated Workflow

agentic-systems

Surrogate Assisted Pedestrian Protection Design via a Foundation Model Orchestrated Workflow

Researchers have developed the first foundation model-orchestrated workflow for crash safety design, reducing evaluation times from hours of conventional CAE simulations to mere seconds.

EXPLORE TOPICS

Discover All Categories

Deep dive into the specific technology sectors that matter most to you.