NOW LET US – AI RAG SaaS Studio TP.HCM
NOW LET US
Digital Product Studio
Back to news
AGENTIC-SYSTEMS...1 min read

"Did you lie?" Evaluating Lie Detectors across Model Scale and Belief-Verified Model Organisms

Share
NOW LET US Article – "Did you lie?" Evaluating Lie Detectors across Model Scale and Belief-Verified Model Organisms

A new study evaluates lie detectors for language models, revealing that while detector performance scales with model capability on prompted lies, current detectors fail sharply when tested on sophisticated, belief-verified model organisms.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title:"Did you lie?" Evaluating Lie Detectors across Model Scale and Belief-Verified Model Organisms

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Robust lie detectors for language models could enable powerful techniques for auditing, monitoring, and post-hoc investigation of model behaviour, but evaluating them requires testbeds where models verifiably believe the opposite of what they say. We show that existing trained model organisms often fail this requirement, leaving prior positive and negative detection results difficult to interpret. We address this with 13 reasoning model organisms whose hidden beliefs are verified in chain-of-thought and shown to generalise to held-out tasks, alongside Varied Deception, a prompted-lying testbed covering a broad range of lie-inducing motivations. On these testbeds we evaluate four detectors: a chain-of-thought judge, a logprob classifier, and two activation probes, including Did-You-Lie (DYL), a new method for training follow-up probes. On prompted lying, across 31 open-weight models spanning 2B to 1T parameters, all four detectors show positive scaling with model capability. However, every activation- and logprob-based detector drops sharply on our trained model organisms, with DYL retaining the most signal; only the chain-of-thought judge remains strong, with 0.82 balanced accuracy, partly as an artefact of our verification process favouring CoT-readable beliefs. Current lie detectors therefore cannot support high-confidence claims about model beliefs, and we suggest research directions that may address some of their current limitations. We release our datasets, model organisms, and trained detectors.

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

© 2026 Now Let Us. All rights reserved.

Source: arXiv cs.AI Recent

Advertisement
Ad slot ready: 5887729102

More in this category

NOW LET US Related – Deployment-Centered Evaluation: Predicting Query-Level Rejection Risk in a Clinical LLM System

agentic-systems

Deployment-Centered Evaluation: Predicting Query-Level Rejection Risk in a Clinical LLM System

A new study proposes a deployment-centered evaluation approach to predict the risk of clinicians rejecting LLM-generated responses in electronic health records. By leveraging deployment-specific context, the prediction model achieves an AUROC of 0.719, paving the way for targeted guardrails in clinical AI systems.

NOW LET US Related – Evoflux: Inference-Time Evolution of Executable Tool Workflows for Compact Agents

agentic-systems

Evoflux: Inference-Time Evolution of Executable Tool Workflows for Compact Agents

Researchers introduce Evoflux, an inference-time evolutionary search method that treats compact tool use as the repair of executable tool workflows, significantly boosting execution feasibility for small planners.

NOW LET US Related – Strategic Decision Support for AI Agents

agentic-systems

Strategic Decision Support for AI Agents

As AI agents increasingly act on behalf of users, a new research paper proposes a strategic decision-support framework that helps agents optimize when to seek human or tool assistance, balancing operational costs with decision accuracy.

NOW LET US Related – TrajGenAgent: A Hierarchical LLM Agent for Human Mobility Trajectory Generation

agentic-systems

TrajGenAgent: A Hierarchical LLM Agent for Human Mobility Trajectory Generation

Researchers have proposed TrajGenAgent, a hierarchical LLM-agent framework that generates realistic human mobility trajectories without model fine-tuning, addressing privacy and cost constraints in urban planning and epidemic control.

NOW LET US Related – PersonaDrive: Human-Style Retrieval-Augmented VLA Agents for Closed-Loop Driving Simulation

agentic-systems

PersonaDrive: Human-Style Retrieval-Augmented VLA Agents for Closed-Loop Driving Simulation

Researchers have introduced PersonaDrive, a breakthrough AI pipeline that leverages Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to simulate diverse human driving styles. This technology promises to revolutionize closed-loop driving simulations by creating highly realistic and varied behavior for non-ego traffic agents.

NOW LET US Related – Definitional alignment before capability alignment: a Design-Science framework for adjudicating claims about AGI

agentic-systems

Definitional alignment before capability alignment: a Design-Science framework for adjudicating claims about AGI

A new research paper proposes DAF-AGI, a design-science framework to resolve conflicting claims about the arrival of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) by prioritizing definitional alignment over capability alignment.

EXPLORE TOPICS

Discover All Categories

Deep dive into the specific technology sectors that matter most to you.