AGENTIC-SYSTEMSApril 3, 20261 min read16 views

Can LLMs Perceive Time? An Empirical Investigation

Large language models struggle to estimate task durations, often overestimating by 4-7x and failing to distinguish between human and machine processing speeds, highlighting a lack of temporal grounding.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

Title:Can LLMs Perceive Time? An Empirical Investigation

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Large language models cannot estimate how long their own tasks take. We investigate this limitation through four experiments across 68 tasks and four model families. Pre-task estimates overshoot actual duration by 4--7$\times$ ($p < 0.001$), with models predicting human-scale minutes for tasks completing in seconds. Relative ordering fares no better: on task pairs designed to expose heuristic reliance, models score at or below chance (GPT-5: 18% on counter-intuitive pairs, $p = 0.033$), systematically failing when complexity labels mislead. Post-hoc recall is disconnected from reality -- estimates diverge from actuals by an order of magnitude in either direction. These failures persist in multi-step agentic settings, with errors of 5--10$\times$. The models possess propositional knowledge about duration from training but lack experiential grounding in their own inference time, with practical implications for agent scheduling, planning and time-critical scenarios.

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Source: arXiv cs.AI Recent

More in this category

agentic-systems

VeriSimpl: Robust Optimization Modeling from Natural Language using Simplification-based Verification

Researchers have introduced VeriSimpl, a novel framework that leverages LLMs and simplification-based verification to accurately translate natural language descriptions into executable optimization formulations.

agentic-systems

SonicSampler: Unified Tile-Aware Kernels for LLM Sampling and Speculative Verification

Researchers introduced SonicSampler, a unified suite of tile-aware Triton kernels designed to accelerate LLM sampling and speculative verification. By fusing the entire pipeline into a single CUDA Graph-compatible kernel, SonicSampler achieves up to 16x speedups over state-of-the-art baselines.

agentic-systems

PersonaTrail: Benchmarking Personalized Web Agents through Browsing Trails

Researchers have introduced PersonaTrail, a novel benchmark evaluating personalized web agents through realistic browsing histories. Alongside it, the PACMem memory framework structures raw browsing data to significantly boost agent performance in inferring user preferences.

agentic-systems

Benchmarking the Personalization Capabilities of Large Language Models

A new study introduces SDR-Bench and SDR-Arena to benchmark the personalization capabilities of LLMs in two-party persuasion scenarios, revealing a personalization plateau among frontier models.

agentic-systems

Incomplete Prompt Jailbreaks in Large Language Models

Researchers have conceptualized Incomplete Prompt Jailbreaks (IPJ), a vulnerability where incomplete harmful prompts bypass LLM safeguards due to delayed refusal behaviors. The discovery of functional neurons offers a novel path for precise neuron-level defense interventions.

agentic-systems

Benchmarking Large Language Models on Multi-Sensor Physical Hazard Assessment

A new benchmark evaluates five leading large language models on multi-sensor physical hazard assessments, revealing a critical vulnerability when evaluating combined sensor risks below individual thresholds. Despite near-perfect accuracy on single-sensor breaches, all models failed to issue precautionary signals for multi-sensor hazards.