NOW LET US – AI RAG SaaS Studio TP.HCM
NOW LET US
Digital Product Studio
Back to news
AGENTIC-SYSTEMS...1 min read

Can LLMs Be CEOs? Benchmarking Strategic Resource Reallocation with Multi-Role Agent Simulation

Share
NOW LET US Article – Can LLMs Be CEOs? Benchmarking Strategic Resource Reallocation with Multi-Role Agent Simulation

A new study introduces CEO-Bench, a benchmark evaluating LLMs in executive roles. While top AI models excel at structural planning, they still struggle with complex strategic decisions and conflicting internal interests.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title:Can LLMs Be CEOs? Benchmarking Strategic Resource Reallocation with Multi-Role Agent Simulation

View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:Evaluating the decision-making capabilities of large language models (LLMs) is a growing research priority, yet existing benchmarks focus on isolated cognitive tasks such as reasoning, knowledge retrieval, and economic rationality in stylized settings. These evaluations overlook the defining challenge of real executive decision-making: integrating conflicting recommendations from specialized stakeholders under information asymmetry, organizational constraints, and temporal dependencies. We introduce \textsc{CEO-Bench}, a multi-agent benchmark that evaluates LLMs on CEO-level strategic resource reallocation -- the process of redirecting capital across business units in a multi-round, constraint-rich organizational environment. In \textsc{CEO-Bench}, LLM agents receive conflicting advice from four role-conditioned C-suite advisors (CFO, CTO, COO, CMO), each with private signals and distinct priorities, and must synthesize these into a concrete allocation plan evaluated along four dimensions: role integration, conditional boldness, history-sensitive judgment, and plan validity. Experiments across five frontier models on 13 scenarios reveal that all models achieve high structural validity but diverge sharply on strategic calibration -- the hardest capability layer. We identify systematic failure modes including single-advisor capture, conservative default under ambiguity, and historical amnesia, and uncover a structural integration-boldness tradeoff: models that engage more deeply with conflicting perspectives tend to produce less decisive action. These findings delineate the current capability boundary of LLMs as organizational decision-makers and inform the design of future AI-assisted executive systems.

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

© 2026 Now Let Us. All rights reserved.

Source: arXiv cs.AI Recent

Advertisement
Ad slot ready: 5887729102

More in this category

NOW LET US Related – Nothing from Something: Can a Language Model Discover 0?

agentic-systems

Nothing from Something: Can a Language Model Discover 0?

A new study investigates whether AI language models can independently discover the mathematical concept of 'zero'. The findings reveal that while models cannot generalize this concept out-of-the-box, language pretraining reduces the required training examples by 50%.

NOW LET US Related – SEAGym: An Evaluation Environment for Self-Evolving LLM Agents

agentic-systems

SEAGym: An Evaluation Environment for Self-Evolving LLM Agents

Researchers have introduced SEAGym, a new evaluation environment designed to accurately measure the self-evolution of LLM agents. This tool addresses the limitations of traditional evaluation methods, which often overlook overfitting or performance degradation.

NOW LET US Related – Closing the Feedback Loop: From Experience Extraction to Insight Governance in Verbal Reinforcement Learning

agentic-systems

Closing the Feedback Loop: From Experience Extraction to Insight Governance in Verbal Reinforcement Learning

Researchers propose a three-layer architecture (rules, evidence, skills) to close the feedback loop in verbal reinforcement learning, solving the retention-forgetting dilemma for LLM agents in non-stationary environments.

NOW LET US Related – MapSatisfyBench: Benchmarking Satisfaction-Aware Map Agents through Behavior-Grounded Implicit Decision Factors

agentic-systems

MapSatisfyBench: Benchmarking Satisfaction-Aware Map Agents through Behavior-Grounded Implicit Decision Factors

Researchers have introduced MapSatisfyBench, a new benchmark for evaluating LLM-based map agents. It shifts the evaluation focus from simple task completion to satisfying implicit user needs and optimizing real-world user satisfaction.

NOW LET US Related – MemTrace: Probing What Final Accuracy Misses in Long-Term Memory

agentic-systems

MemTrace: Probing What Final Accuracy Misses in Long-Term Memory

While LLM agents increasingly maintain long-term memory, traditional evaluation methods fail to show how facts behave under changing conditions. The new MemTrace benchmark reveals that the primary bottleneck in AI memory is evidence utilization, not retrieval.

NOW LET US Related – Surrogate Assisted Pedestrian Protection Design via a Foundation Model Orchestrated Workflow

agentic-systems

Surrogate Assisted Pedestrian Protection Design via a Foundation Model Orchestrated Workflow

Researchers have developed the first foundation model-orchestrated workflow for crash safety design, reducing evaluation times from hours of conventional CAE simulations to mere seconds.

EXPLORE TOPICS

Discover All Categories

Deep dive into the specific technology sectors that matter most to you.